FILM TV 298A
Special Studies in Film and Television: Visual Development for Animation
Course statistics
- Predicted GPA
- 3.94
- n = 428 · 12 terms · ± 0.026
- A range
- 96%
- of letter grades
- Taken P/NP
- 0%
- — of those passed
- D / F / W
- 0.0%
- incl. withdrawals
Sections in Fall 2026
| Section | Status | Enrolled | Seat risk | Meets | Instructor | Predicted GPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sem 1 | Open |
0 of 8
0% full
|
fills | R 10:00am-12:50pm | Huang, G.J. | 3.94n=428 · course average |
| Sem 2 | Open |
0 of 12
0% full
|
fills | T 4:00pm-6:50pm | Winfrey, A.M. | 3.94n=428 · course average |
| Sem 3 | Open |
0 of 15
0% full
|
could fill | M 1:00pm-3:50pm | Okimura, L.C., TA | 3.94n=14 · this instructorsmall sample |
| Sem 4 | Open |
0 of 14
0% full
|
fills | R 6:00pm-8:50pm | Trice, J.N. | 3.94n=428 · course average |
| Sem 50 | Open |
18 of 100
18% full
|
seats likely | Time TBA | Wagmister, C. | 3.94n=428 · course average |
| Sem 51 | Open |
16 of 100
16% full
|
seats likely | Time TBA | Wagmister, C. | 3.94n=428 · course average |
Enrollment history
Final enrollment per term, averaged across that term's sections. Four years deep, summer excluded. Per-section live curves are on each section page.
- 1321F
- 1722W
- 1322S
- 1422F
- 1523W
- 1423S
- 1023F
- 1524W
- 1224S
- 1424F
- 2025W
- 1625S
Peak 20
Most recent
16
in 25S
12 terms on record
Grade distribution
- A+ 58 · 12.7%
- A 331 · 72.7%
- A- 20 · 4.4%
- B+ 12 · 2.6%
- B 5 · 1.1%
- C 2 · 0.4%
- S 23 · 5.1%
- I 4 · 0.9%
Grey bars are non-letter outcomes — P/NP, S/U, incompletes. They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted | Raw | n | Terms | A range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROSMAN, MARK E | 3.94 | 3.94 | 111 | 7 | 95% |
| MCDONALD, WILLIAM CONROY | 3.99 | 4.00 | 48 | 3 | 100% |
| VILLAREJO, AMY | 3.98 | 3.99 | 42 | 2 | 100% |
| SMUKLER, MAYA MONTANEZ | 3.87 | 3.83 | 28 | 2 | 82% |
| GOLUB, PETER RICHARD | 3.97 | 3.99 | 25 | 2 | 100% |
| MERCER, CELIA L | 3.98 | 4.00 | 22 | 2 | 100% |
| FINELL, MELISSA A | 3.90 | 3.88 | 19 small sample | 1 | 89% |
| RAVETTO, KRISTINE SUZANNE | 3.95 | 3.95 | 17 small sample | 1 | 100% |
| HELM, FREDERICK WILLIAM | 3.97 | 4.00 | 16 small sample | 1 | 100% |
| SCHWARTZ, TERI ELLEN | 3.97 | 4.00 | 15 small sample | 1 | 100% |
| OKIMURA, LYNN CHIEKO | 3.94 | 3.93 | 14 small sample | 1 | 93% |
| RASTEGAR, ROYA ZAHRA | 3.89 | 3.83 | 12 small sample | 1 | 83% |
| MCHUGH, KATHLEEN A | 3.86 | 3.75 | 11 small sample | 1 | 82% |
| KELLY, RORY M | 3.89 | 3.82 | 11 small sample | 1 | 91% |
| GUEVARA-FLANAGAN, KRISTY | 3.97 | 4.00 | 10 small sample | 1 | 100% |
| PAREDES, VERONICA ANDREA | 3.97 | 4.00 | 10 small sample | 1 | 100% |
| SMITH, BECKY JEAN | 3.97 | 4.00 | 9 small sample | 1 | 100% |
| FLANAGAN, KRISTINE | 3.95 | 3.96 | 8 small sample | 1 | 100% |
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department — so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
By term
- 21F 3.93 n=39
- 22W 4.00 n=48
- 22S 3.97 n=56
- 22F 4.00 n=26
- 23W 4.00 n=28
- 23S 3.99 n=27
- 23F 3.70 n=10
- 24W 3.93 n=29
- 24S 3.89 n=46
- 24F 3.93 n=14
- 25W 3.93 n=76
- 25S 3.92 n=29