Skip to content
Dibs Fall 2026

ENGCOMP 3

English Composition, Rhetoric, and Language

Course statistics

Predicted GPA
3.61
n = 6,520 · 15 terms · ± 0.007
A range
72%
of letter grades
Taken P/NP
1%
92% of those passed
D / F / W
1.5%
incl. withdrawals

Sections in Fall 2026

Sections offered, with live enrollment and predicted GPA
Section Status Enrolled Seat risk Meets Instructor Predicted GPA
Lec 1 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills TR 11:00am-12:15pm Cavanagh, R.L.
3.51n=149 · this instructor
Lec 2 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills TR 12:30pm-1:45pm Cavanagh, R.L.
3.51n=149 · this instructor
Lec 3 Closed
12 of 12
100% full
fills TR 11:00am-12:15pm Bullwinkle, D.
3.61n=6,520 · course average
Lec 4 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills TR 12:30pm-1:45pm Bullwinkle, D.
3.61n=6,520 · course average
Lec 5 Closed
12 of 12
100% full
fills TR 8:00am-9:15am Chichester, T.L.
3.82n=264 · this instructor
Lec 6 Closed
14 of 14
100% full
fills TR 9:30am-10:45am Chichester, T.L.
3.82n=264 · this instructor
Lec 7 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills TR 11:00am-12:15pm Chichester, T.L.
3.82n=264 · this instructor
Lec 8 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills MW 12:30pm-1:45pm No instructors
3.61n=6,520 · course average
Lec 9 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills MW 2:00pm-3:15pm Manojlovic, M.
3.76n=22 · this instructor
Lec 10 Closed
14 of 14
100% full
fills TR 11:00am-12:15pm Moe, M.L.
3.76n=588 · this instructor
Lec 11 Closed
12 of 12
100% full
fills TR 12:30pm-1:45pm Moe, M.L.
3.76n=588 · this instructor
Lec 13 Open
11 of 12
92% full
fills MW 9:30am-10:45am Juliano, L.
3.61n=6,520 · course average
Lec 14 Open
10 of 14
71% full
fills MW 11:00am-12:15pm Juliano, L.
3.61n=6,520 · course average
Lec 15 Open
9 of 12
75% full
fills MW 12:30pm-1:45pm Juliano, L.
3.61n=6,520 · course average
Lec 16 Closed
12 of 12
100% full
fills MW 3:30pm-4:45pm Sussman, D.B.
3.73n=303 · this instructor
Lec 17 Closed
14 of 14
100% full
fills TR 12:30pm-1:45pm Deuel, N.A.
3.82n=322 · this instructor
Lec 18 Closed
14 of 14
100% full
fills TR 2:00pm-3:15pm Deuel, N.A.
3.82n=322 · this instructor
Lec 19 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills MW 11:00am-12:15pm Wartanian, R.J.
3.56n=514 · this instructor
Lec 20 Closed
12 of 12
100% full
fills MW 12:30pm-1:45pm Wartanian, R.J.
3.56n=514 · this instructor
Lec 21 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills MW 2:00pm-3:15pm Wartanian, R.J.
3.56n=514 · this instructor
Lec 22 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills MW 9:30am-10:45am Page, G.B.
3.78n=199 · this instructor
Lec 23 Open
11 of 13
85% full
fills MW 5:00pm-6:15pm Sussman, D.B.
3.73n=303 · this instructor
Lec 24 Open
8 of 13
62% full
fills MW 9:30am-10:45am Mehdizadeh, N.
3.64n=253 · this instructor
Lec 25 Open
4 of 13
31% full
fills MW 11:00am-12:15pm Mehdizadeh, N.
3.64n=253 · this instructor
Lec 26 Open
9 of 12
75% full
fills MW 12:30pm-1:45pm Mehdizadeh, N.
3.64n=253 · this instructor
Lec 28 Open
4 of 12
33% full
fills MW 11:00am-12:15pm Kipen, D.M.
3.51n=467 · this instructor
Lec 29 Open
6 of 13
46% full
fills MW 12:30pm-1:45pm Kipen, D.M.
3.51n=467 · this instructor
Lec 30 Closed
13 of 13
100% full
fills MW 2:00pm-3:15pm Kipen, D.M.
3.51n=467 · this instructor

Enrollment history

Final enrollment per term, averaged across that term's sections. Four years deep, summer excluded. Per-section live curves are on each section page.

  • 2121F
  • 2022W
  • 2022S
  • 2122F
  • 2123W
  • 2023S
  • 2123F
  • 2124W
  • 2024S
  • 2124F
  • 2125W
  • 2025S
Enrolment by term: 21F 21, 22W 20, 22S 20, 22F 21, 23W 21, 23S 20, 23F 21, 24W 21, 24S 20, 24F 21, 25W 21, 25S 20
Peak 21 Most recent 20 in 25S 12 terms on record

Grade distribution

  • A+ 363 · 5.5%
  • A 2,855 · 43.3%
  • A- 1,448 · 22.0%
  • B+ 873 · 13.2%
  • B 481 · 7.3%
  • B- 183 · 2.8%
  • C+ 98 · 1.5%
  • C 90 · 1.4%
  • C- 36 · 0.5%
  • D+ 16 · 0.2%
  • D 18 · 0.3%
  • D- 7 · 0.1%
  • F 52 · 0.8%
  • P 35 · 0.5%
  • NP 3 · 0.0%
  • I 30 · 0.5%
  • DR 2 · 0.0%

Grey bars are non-letter outcomes — P/NP, S/U, incompletes. They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.

By instructor

Instructor Predicted Raw n Terms A range
MOE, MICHELE LOUISE 3.76 3.76 588 15 83%
PRESCOTT-JOHNSON, TARA L 3.67 3.67 559 10 75%
WARTANIAN, RAFFI J 3.56 3.56 514 12 63%
KIPEN, DAVID MORRIS 3.51 3.50 467 10 56%
MARTINEZ, ANDREW M 3.84 3.84 389 9 88%
DEUEL, NATHAN A 3.82 3.83 322 8 86%
POPHAM, SHELBY A 2.72 2.68 310 7 19%
SUSSMAN, DANIEL BENJAMIN 3.73 3.74 303 9 81%
CHICHESTER, TEDDI LYNN 3.82 3.83 264 4 89%
MEHDIZADEH, NEDDA 3.64 3.64 253 6 75%
FALLOWS, RANDALL JONATHAN 3.68 3.68 232 5 73%
PAGE, GABRIEL B 3.78 3.79 199 4 86%
STONE, BRUCE D 2.93 2.88 187 8 29%
JAURRETCHE, COLLEEN M 3.60 3.60 185 6 68%
JULIANO, LOGAN 3.68 3.68 165 3 80%
CHRISTENSEN, TAMAR S 3.49 3.48 159 3 55%
LANG, JACOB WARREN 3.62 3.62 149 5 71%
CAVANAGH, ROBERT LOFTUS 3.51 3.50 149 3 62%
HARTENBERGER, LAURA A 3.85 3.87 132 4 93%
HITCHNER, THOMAS A 3.71 3.72 131 4 81%
WATSON, DANA CAIRNS 3.75 3.77 94 1 83%
SAMUELSON, MARY G 3.51 3.49 67 3 55%
LISOVSKY, KARL F 3.50 3.47 63 2 59%
JULIANO, LINZI MICHEL 3.58 3.58 57 2 72%
GOMEZ, CARLOS RAFAEL 3.70 3.73 45 1 78%
DE, ESHA NIYOGI 3.79 3.84 43 1 93%
SPOONER, MARY 3.74 3.79 41 1 93%
RUBINSON, GREGORY J 3.41 3.35 41 2 56%
DICKEY, DOMINIQUA 3.72 3.76 41 1 83%
RHODD-LEE, HOLLAND M 3.80 3.86 41 2 93%
SOLIS, SAMANTHA 3.88 3.97 38 2 97%
PEITZMAN, FAYE C 3.57 3.54 22 1 64%
CARRASCO, AMANDA 3.65 3.67 22 1 77%
MANOJLOVIC, MAJA 3.76 3.85 22 1 82%
JOHNSON, DARIEN 3.67 3.70 21 1 90%
RODRIGUEZ DRISSI, SUSANNAH 3.76 3.86 21 1 86%
SHERRER, THOMAS A 3.70 3.75 21 1 76%
HOEGBERG, MIRANDA 3.66 3.69 21 1 71%
ESCOBEDO, CINDY R 3.64 3.65 20 1 65%
HOLTEN, CHRISTINE 3.43 3.31 20 1 50%
FOXX, KIANA 3.37 3.21 19 small sample 1 53%
PATCHIGONDLA, JADA 3.57 3.54 19 small sample 1 63%
KERN, ANDREA NICOLE 3.84 4.00 18 small sample 1 100%
DAVIS, MARGARET ELLEN 3.74 3.84 18 small sample 1 89%
MCIVER, MIA LOUISE GROVES 3.58 3.55 16 small sample 1 69%
EPPS, JAMES LATIFAH 3.80 4.00 12 small sample 1 100%

“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department — so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.

By term