PHILOS 9
Principles of Critical Reasoning
Lecture, four hours; discussion, one hour. Nature of arguments: how to analyze them and assess soundness of reasoning they represent. Common fallacies that often occur in arguments discussed in light of what counts as good deductive or inductive inference. Other topics include use of language in argumentation to arouse emotions as contrasted with conveying thoughts, logic of scientific experiments and hypothesis-testing in general, and some general ideas about probability and its application in making normative decisions (e.g., betting). P/NP or letter grading.
Course statistics
- Predicted GPA
- 3.27
- n = 171 · 6 terms · ± 0.040
- A range
- 47%
- of letter grades
- Taken P/NP
- 15%
- 97% of those passed
- D / F / W
- 2.3%
- incl. withdrawals
Sections in Fall 2026
Enrollment history
Final enrollment per term, averaged across that term's sections. Four years deep, summer excluded. Per-section live curves are on each section page.
- 2922S
- 2623S
- 2624F
Grade distribution
- A+ 17 · 8.2%
- A 33 · 15.9%
- A- 30 · 14.4%
- B+ 28 · 13.5%
- B 22 · 10.6%
- B- 17 · 8.2%
- C+ 6 · 2.9%
- C 5 · 2.4%
- C- 9 · 4.3%
- D+ 1 · 0.5%
- F 3 · 1.4%
- P 30 · 14.4%
- NP 1 · 0.5%
- I 6 · 2.9%
Grey bars are non-letter outcomes — P/NP, S/U, incompletes. They are excluded from the GPA entirely rather than scored, because counting a P as a 4.0 would be a fabrication.
By instructor
| Instructor | Predicted | Raw | n | Terms | A range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORMORE, CALVIN G | 3.34 | 3.35 | 94 | 3 | 47% |
| JOHNSON, MARK C | 3.14 | 3.12 | 77 | 3 | 47% |
“Predicted” is shrunk toward the course average, which is itself shrunk toward the department — so an instructor with a handful of students sits near the course mean rather than topping the list.
By term
- 22S 2.94 n=26
- 221 3.47 n=36
- 23S 2.91 n=26
- 231 3.28 n=35
- 241 3.28 n=23
- 24F 3.54 n=25